A Human Face Asymmetries in Facial Actions
Title Page
Contents
Acknowledgements
Abstract
Introduction
Method
Results
Discussion
Summary and Conclusions
Tables
Appendix R
Appendix S
Appendix Y
References

Contents

Title Page

Acknowledgements

Abstract

Introduction

Method

Results

Discussion

Summary and Conclusions

Tables

Appendix R - Reliability

Appendix S - Production of Startle Noise

Appendix Y - Derivation of Scores for Unilateral Actions

Reference Notes

References

Figures and Tables

Figure 1 - Action Units Measured in this Study

Figure 2 - Outline of Study

Figure 3 - Asymmetry Measures of this Study

Table 1 - Distribution of Asymmetry for Each Action Unit by Mode of Request, Verbal Description versus Imitating a Model

Table 2 - Distribution of Asymmetry for each AU for Four Measures: Bilateral Asymmetry, Better Unilateral Control, Preferred Unilateral Side, and Side Rated Easier

Table 3 - Number of Repititions of Requested, Bilateral Actions Related to the Proportion of Asymmetrical Actions and the Proportion of Asymmetrical Actions that were Left Stronger

Table 4 - Summary of Laterality by Action for Each Asymmetry Measure

Table 5 - Significant Changes in the Proportion of Subjects who Shifted Laterality (Right vs. Left) Between Pairs of Asymmetry Measures

Table 6 - Correlations between Measures of Asymmetry

Table 7 - Number of Significant Correlations between Different Asymmetry Measures in Table 6

Table 8 - Factors and Loadings for Two Analyses Regarding Asymmetry of Bilateral and Unilateral Actions

Table 9 - Significant Correlations between Different Action Units within each set of Asymmetry Measures

Table 10- Factors and Loadings for each Action Unit within Four Asymmetry Measures

Table 11- Significant Correlations between Different Action Units between Different sets of Asymmetry Measures

Table 12- The Relation between the Better Unilateral Action and the Onside, Offside Intensities and the Occurance of Other AUs

Table 13- Distribution of Scores for Spontaneous Happy Expressions

Table 14- Laterality of Subjects for each common Action Unit in the Three Startle Conditions

Table 15- Distributions of Asymmetry Scores for Common Actions in the Simulated Startle

Table 16- Symmetry of Subjects for each Frequently Observed Action Unit in the Emotion Simula- tion Condition

Table 17- Average Asymmetry of Actions in the Simulation of each Emotion Expression

Table 18- Correlations of Asymmetry Scores in the Simulate Emotion Expression Condition with Each of the Asymmetry Scores from the Requested Individual Action Conditions by AU

Table 19- Asymmetry of Actions for each Simulation by the number of Co-Occurring Actions

Table 20- Differences in Degree of Bilateral Asymmetry for Actions Appearing in Different Conditions

Table 21- Bilateral Asymmetry Scores for AU 12 for the Deliberate, Simulated, and Emotional Conditions

Table 22- Subjects who Showed Significant Laterality across Action Units for each of the Four Asymmetry Measures